PANCASILA DAN PERUBAHAN SOSIAL: PERSPEKTIF INDIVIDU DAN STRUKTUR DALAM DINAMIKA INTERAKSI SOSIAL

Ujianto Singgih Prayitno

PANCASILA DAN PERUBAHAN SOSIAL: PERSPEKTIF INDIVIDU DAN STRUKTUR DALAM DINAMIKA INTERAKSI SOSIAL

Ujianto Singgih Prayitno

Abstract

The background of this review is the fact that today’s society marginalize Pancasila as the values and nmoral insocial interaction. By using contemporary sociological perspectives that develops relationships between individual and structures the writer concludes that pancasila as the vision of social change, see the reciprocal relation between individual and structure. It has greatly affect the quality of social change in the society. The consequence of this view is that Pancasila materialized in values and morality embodied in individual and collective level. Therefore it has become our collective duty to contextualized and implement Pancasila in a variety of direction of life in national and state levels.

Keywords

Pancasila; interaksi sosial; individu; struktur.

Full Text:

Untitled

References

Ancok, Djamaludin. 2003. Modal Sosial dan Kualitas Masyarakat, Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan guru Besar Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, 3 Mei 2003.

Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loic Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burns. Tom R. (et.all). 1987. Man, Decisions, Society. Swiss: Gordon and Breach Science Publisher.

Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

Coleman, James S. 1994. “Social Capital, Human Capital, and Investment in Youth,” in Anne C. Peterson and Jeylan T. Mortimer, eds. Youth Unemployment and Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Etzioni, Amitai. 1986. Organisasi-Organisasi Modern. Jakarta: Press Universitas Indonesia.

Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Values and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.

Fukuyama, F., L. Omer and N. Hirst. 1997. Social Capital: The Great Disruptio.,The 1997 Tanner Lectures. Oxford: Brasenose College.

Giddens, Anthony. 1995. The Constitution of Society: Otline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Giddens, Anthony. 1995. The Constitution of Society: Teori Strukturasi untuk Analisis Sosial, a.b., Adi Loka Sujono. Pasuruan: Pedati

Granovetter, Mark S. 1985, “Economic Action, Social Structure and Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology. 91:481-510.

Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge MA: Basil Blackwell.

Herry-Priyono. 2003. Anthony Giddens, Suatu Pengantar. cet-. Jakarta: 2KPG.

Horton, Paul B Dan Chester L. Hunt. 1984. Sociology. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Prayitno, Ujianto Singgih. 2013. Kontekstualisasi Kearifan Lokal dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta: P3DI Setjen DPR RI dan Azza Grafika.

Prayitno, Ujianto Singgih. 2014. Perubahan Sosial Dinamika Perkembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Jakarta: P3DI Setjen DPR RI dan Publica Press.

Ritzer and Goodman.2004. Teori Sosiologi Modern, a.b. Alimandan. Jakarta:Prenada Media.

Ritzer, George. 1996. Sociological Theory.New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Suparlan, Parsudi. 2008. Dari Masyarakat Majemuk menuju masyarakat Multikultural, Jakarta: Yayasan Pengembangan Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian.

Veeger, KJ. 1985. Realitas Sosial, Refleksi Filsafat Sosial atas Hubungan Individu–Masyarakat dalam Cakrawala Sejarah Sosiologi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Wallace, R.A and Wolf, A. 1999. Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition. Fifth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Wirutomo, Paulus (et.all). 2012. Sistem Sosial Indonesia. Jakarta: UI-Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v5i2.460